Now Dr. Woodrow Monte just wrote While Science Sleeps after he found four additional teratology studies, all showing birth defects. And you say aspartame safety is not questionable? Do you consider 6 studies showing aspartame causes birth defects meaningless? How can you ignore the FDA "admitting" aspartame causes birth defects. Dr. Monte explains how the G. D. Searle Co. made a deal with the FDA to release no studies showing birth defects. The FDA did just that, and the river of autism floods our land. Dr Monte made somebody furious because they blew up his house with him in it and he woke up in the hospital. If you have an inkling of sincerity about the work you do, get While Science Sleeps right away!
Here is Dr. Louis Elsas' testimony before the Board of Inquiry, a pediatric professor then with Emory University in genetics. http://www.wnho.net/dr_elsas_testimony.pdf Notice his comments on aspartame and birth defects.
You line up agencies from FDA to AMA like birds on a wire chirping Aspartame is safe! Aspartame is safe! The industry has ties with them all, just as it owns your employer, and you. Internationally aspartame was rubber stamp approved on the basis of corrupt FDA blessings. In New Zealand I visited Food Standards who said, "We relied on the FDA". How did it get approved in England? Through a business deal between the manufacturer and Dr. Paul Turner of the agency there. http://www.mpwhi.com/how_aspartame_got_approved_in_england.htm Parliament had a big blowout but did not rescind the order. No studies were done in England. Dr. Jacqueline Verrett, FDA toxicologist, testified before Congress in 1987 that aspartame was on the market then and still had not been proven safe. We are very knowledgeable of the game industry plays.
A study is only legitimate if its by independent, unbiased researchers, unfunded by the producers. Industry showed in their original studies how far they will go to have something approved that is toxic. Dr. Ralph Walton investigated for 60 Minutes the difference when studies were done by independent researchers as compared by those funded by industry. 92% of independent studies showed aspartame is unsafe. He said if you eliminate 6 studies the FDA had something to do with, and one pro-industry summary, 100% of independent studies show the problems we've been seeing for decades. Only industry controlled and financed studies showed safety, and that's all you care about! This is why the FDA once attempted to have G. D. Searle indicted for fraud. You can't take a poisonous drug and show it safe. http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html
Because of the behavior of the original manufacturer, G. D. Searle, and the shenanigans they tried to pull, Dr. John Olney demanded they do their studies in his lab so he could make sure the studies were legitimate. As expected, the studies showed brain damage. Olney thought it wouldn't be approved but did not know that Searle didn't give the results of these studies to the FDA. http://www.sweetremedy.tv/pages/rumsfeld3.html
I'm not telling you anything you don't know already. I've sent you information consistently for over a decade, and your notes showing your concern about me giving out the facts on radio and to journalists confirms your frustration in not being able to conceal that aspartame is but a chemical poison. Your epistles to papers like the Miami Herald attempting to get people to believe aspartame is safe for pregnant women, phenylketonurics and consumers with liver problems is an abomination before God! http://www.wnho.net/mh_aspartame_letter.htm This response by Dr. Russell Blaylock about it has been around the world. Note he says: "It has come to my attention that the Calorie Control Council, a front group for the NutraSweet Company, recently suggested that aspartame was safe for women to use during pregnancy, as well as by those with serious liver disease and phenylketonurics. This is the most serious breech of public trust in the history of this nation. There is not one long-term study of aspartame safety ever conducted on the offspring of pregnant women consuming aspartame. Yet, there are numerous studies indicating aspartame could pose a serious danger to both mother and infant."
Our new century is full of insanity and terror. 400 atomic-electric Fukushimas like ghouls wait to rain massacre planet wide on stumbling mankind. Japan is but a single earthquake from eradication. There is no solution to the perpetual storage required for millions of "spent uranium" tubes which shall inevitably shed everlasting destruction. Is this your rationale: "We're all going to die anyway and I'm making big money poisoning babies, so what difference does it make?" My expectation is less morbid. I believe mankind and the human family will be divinely saved, and every life is precious, so now who speaks for the unborn? Who will shout against genocide and blind commercial greed? You're a Pied Piper, Beth Hubrich, caring not for the devastation you preach. Shame!
There have been many experts who have written against you pushing aspartame on pregnant women: http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_mob_figts_evidence.htm You've read these before and you keep it up.
Suppose you have to care for autistic children? How would you like it and how upset would you be if someone lied you into using it, so now your dreams are smashed and you future is an endless dark tunnel of caring for these incurable victims of a known poison, and it was all done to get the dollars they made off of selling you the poison. Multiply that a thousand, a million times. How soulless one must be to live such a perfidious life! Who can count the babies perishing from your lies? Think of the weeping women wanting family and children but never told aspartame is an endocrine disrupting agent, stimulates prolactin, changes the menses and causes infertility, so they forever mourn. There is a Higher Power, and I would not covet your judgment!
Dr. Adrian Gross, FDA scientist and toxicologist, told Congress in l985 that aspartame violates the Delaney Amendment because it causes brain tumors and brain cancer. Further he said FDA shouldn't have been able to set an allowable ADI. What do you expect when the molecule breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent. His last words to Congress were "And if the FDA violates its own laws who is left to protect the public." We are here, Beth Hubrich, because you lie. The public has no governmental defender since FDA gets most of its revenues from the drug makers, and is simply their Branch Office in Washington. Do you know how hard it is to listen to a young woman cry "I want to live, I want to live" when she has several aspartame brain tumors?
The Report to Schools written by aspartame experts, and the ADD people reveals the horrors visited on children whose parents were not warned. http://www.mpwhi.com/report_on_aspartame_and_children.htm What do you think an excitotoxin, aspartic acid, a neurotoxin, phenylalanine and free methyl alcohol does to the brains of children. A Norwegian study showed aspartame destroys the brain, especially in the area of learning.
Over a hundred studies by independent researchers show aspartame toxicity, but the Calorie Control Council and you, Beth Hubrich, fight them all. The 1974 FDA task force examining aspartame and G.D.Searle concluded: "we have uncovered serious deficiencies in Searle's operations and practices, which undermine the basis for reliance on Searle's integrity in conducting high quality animal research to accurately determine the toxic potential of its products." The task force report concluded with the recommendation that G.D. Searle should face a Grand Jury "to identify more particularly the nature of the violations, and to identify all those responsible."
So what did G. D. Searle do? They sued to get the comments of the Task Force off the record. Those records are forever. You can't clean them up. Aspartame is simply poison. Six studies show FDA knew aspartame causes birth defects, and admitted it. If you have any integrity retract your assurances of aspartame safety.
Here's the manufacturers' game: Diana Dow Edwards was a researcher funded by Monsanto to study possible birth defects. Preliminary reports showed damage from the poison, so funding for the study was cut off.
The International Life Sciences Institute, an industry front group, lives by the rule: If you can't say aspartame is safe you get no more funding. Read about ILSI in the UPI Investigation by Gregory Gordon. http://www.mpwhi.com/upi_1987_aspartame_report.pdf This is how industry works to get what it wants. Notice how Dr. Wurtman was threatened and his research funds were rejected. Now he speaks against aspartame no more, but his paper trail says it all including his book Dietary Phenylalanine and Brain Function.
Your 2003 report says, "Importantly, aspartame never enters the bloodstream and therefore cannot travel to essential organs." Was it written by Mother Goose? Of course, it enters the bloodstream as this post from an industry book admits: http://www.wnho.net/answering_monsantos_denial.htm
In the attached notice you say, "While we are pleased that ANSES recognizes that available data do not suggest an adverse effect of low-calorie sweeteners during pregnancy their recommendation for further research, based on a single study may unduly alarm pregnant women." In other words, " don't do a study on aspartame". How alarmed do you think women are today when they bring home an autistic baby and wonder why they were never told the truth?
Note how easy is it to show aspartame quickly affects the brains of children? Dr. Miguel Baret in the Dominion Republic changed the diet of 360 children from diet pop to aspartame juice. He told me if only a small amount of the children were affected it would not be conclusive. However, since almost all of them suffered with aspartame symptoms and many developed "abnormal restlessness, lack of concentration, irritability and depression, it was obvious that aspartame was the cause. Nobody who knows how deadly aspartame is would even do a study on children but this was accidental and serves to show you that almost immediately aspartame effects children.
Beth Hubrich, retract your report. Not a shred of neutral evidence shows aspartame safe for pregnant women. But an overwhelming flood of medical testimony proves it deadly for mother and child. Hang your head in shame! You've seen the documentation for years. You know aspartame is a weapon of mass destruction. Be honest with yourself and the rest of humanity.
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
Founder, Mission Possible World Health International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770-242-2599
E-Mail: BettyM19@mindspring.com
http://www.wpwhi.com
http://www.wnho.net
http://www.dorway.com
Aspartame Toxicity Center: http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
